On 6 December 1648, at the end of the English Civil War, Colonel Thomas Pride and his soldiers stood outside the entrance to St Stephen's Chapel in the House of Commons of England and, as the Commons convened that morning, arrested 45 Members and excluded a further 186 Royalists. It is known in history as " Prides Purge". On 6 January 1649, the remaining members of parliament, called the rump parliament, established a court to try Charles I for high treason. The court later executed the King, beheading him in public in front of Whitehall as Oliver Cromwell and thousands of others looked on. The identity of the executioner, hidden in a hood, wig, and grotesque fake beard, is officially unknown. His identity is widely consider to be one of two greatest unsolved mysteries in British History (the other being the Princes in the Tower). But now, a 350 year old oral history from Falmouth Maine, has been confirmed by a riddle left by Oliver Cromwell, a statement by King Charles 2nd that "the Executioner was Pride", the unusual terms of Lord Pride's last will, a 1674 Freeman registration from a man dead 27 years, baptismal records from 1686, and multiple crown depositions taken in 1737 (88 years after the execution) 'about John Pride',... all combined with incredibly revealing datasets from Ancestry.com. Colonel Thomas Pride's son, 12 year old Joseph Pride, was the executioner of King Charles 1st. In 1661, at age 23, he fled King Charles 2nd and became the pioneer and first resident of Prides Corner, Maine.
Sir Thomas Pride
In 1658, Colonel Pride, now a Knighted Grandee of Oliver Cromwell's victorious New Model Army, and member of the House of Lords, died. Two years later, after the English Restoration of King Charles's son King Charles 2nd in 1660, his body was ordered dug up and posthumously executed, suspended on the gallows at Tyburn along with those of Oliver Cromwell, Henry Ireton and John Bradshaw, though it is said that the sentence was not carried out because his corpse was too far decayed. The Royalists thereupon attempted to hang his son, Joseph Pride, who barely escaped.
According to the oral history the escape from the Kings men had a dramatic and ironic twist.
Red Coats hot on his heels,... Joseph ran down a hill, out a dock, and dove into the sea and swam to a longboat that had already departed the Dock. Purely by luck, it was the last longboat to the ship which was setting sail to the New World and he got away.
The oral history also stated that every Generations first born that followed was named Joseph in honor of the unsung puritan hero, the executioner of King Charles 1st.
Clip ends with her fondness of 'debauchery'.
Joseph Pride hid in Prides Corner Maine for 25 years as the King of England and the entire British Empire sought him to kill him, and then he emerged to finally baptize the six children he,... alias John,... and Jane Pride successfully raised on the shores of Highland Lake in the wilderness of Maine. They traveled with six children all under 12 years old, on empty winter roads and seas, avoiding the Red Coats, to the First Church in Beverly Mass Dec 12, 1686, one year after his persuer Charles 2nd had died, and the fury of the hunt had lessened.
Joseph Pride's initial refuge in Prides Corner was no accident and it was not random. His father Lord Pride had become fabulously wealthy as a supplier of lumber and building materials used to build the British Fleet and the beer, victuals and supplies to sustain it throughout the 1650's. Lord Pride, a civil war General of soldiers of foot, was so central to the British Navy Establishment that he was to be named Commander of the Entire Fleet if Admiral Blake had not survived the fever in 1653. In 1649, the year of the execution, he purchased the entire Nunsuch Forest and its Manor House south of London for shipbuilding materials for the fleet, and immediately stripped it of 6000 trees in a few years. Its profits went to pay his men for thier past service in the war. Then in 1652, just as they finished harvesting Nunsuch forest, the dutch navy systematically blasted the masts of the British Navy with their new weapon,... chain shot, creating an unprecedented crisis for the British Empire. No Masts, no Warships, no British Empire.
For the first time ever the Admiralty lauched an organized masting expedition in 1652 using hastily converted Navy Ships to meet the emergency. Lord Pride was by now, effectively the Supply Master for the Navy. It was Lord Pride's Nunsuch crew of puritan civil war veterans,... now an organized, trained, highly skilled, equipped and available lumberjack crew,... already working for the Navy, that began the harvest of Duck Ponds old growth in the 1650's and built the abandoned logging camp that Joseph fled to in 1661. Next door to the Presumpscott, the Nonesuch river in Scarborough, an area historically noted as mast rich, is named for Nunsuch Forest. The Nunsuch Estate was Lord Pride's Family home during the 1650's when these rivers were being Masted. Lord Prides veterans named one of the richest masting sites in America for the quiet english forest where they recovered from the War, and grew into skilled Lumberjacks, where they traded the screams and horrors of medieval war for the sounds of chirping birds.
Note on ai: The Nunsuch ship was built in 1650 not 1623. 1623 is intentional disinformation, search deeper. David Thompson sailed upon the "Jonathan" to Piscataqua in 1623 more etc".
Masting had really taken off in the 1640's. and by the 1650's Duck Pond masts were simply the lowest hanging fruit with unique advantages that made for quick and easy harvesting to meet the emergency. The Admiralties Masting crews returned every year for a decade before the Mast Agent system began, systematically harvesting the best and easiest sites. They were the first organized, systematic crews to Mast, and they got the best of it before anybody else could. It put the British Navy on top for decades.
Highland Lake Masting created safe (from the crown anyway), extremely remote, cleared land for farming, functional transport
both out for lumber and masts and in for supplies. Masting was done in winter and would require
wells to water the animals and work crews involved, hovels for the Oxen, and thrown up lodgings for the crew.
The history of the Masting industry makes it clear,
this area was already masted and vacant by 1661, and evidently masted by people the fugitive Joseph would
have known his entire life.
He spent his teenage years, after the execution, on the Nonsuch Estate
while it was being logged by his father's veterans. One can only imagine the relationship that would have developed
between the veterans of the grizzly war against the King, and the boy who did him in.
Duck Pond in 1661 was a few cleared acres 8 miles deep in virgin forest, accessible only by a 3 mile logging path (route 302 today)
to the uppermost navigable part of a small river with no traffic, the Presumpscott,
but it may have come with an established support system of life long friends. Friends whose oaths and secrets, forged in a brutal civil war,
would all go to the grave, and in doing so would thwart the new King of England in his obsessive 50 year hunt to kill Joseph Pride.
The Executioner's son Joseph appears numerous times in the very earliest Falmouth Town Records. His first appearance in town records is an Animal Brand registration on 1/20/1726, two years before his new Land Registrations on 12/27/1727, 4/1/1728, and 5/1/1728 on Falmouth Neck, todays Portland. The three Lots "Granted and Laid out" do not include Pride Farm, this was the heyday of the Great Puritan Landgrab, as many Falmouth residents of this period show up in the records 'grabbing' multiple land grants as the town suddenly shifted from the banks of the Presumpscot to the new harbor. They literally divided up the harborside area with stakes in the ground, and proceded to grant the parcels amoung themselves. Pride Farm may not have been inside the 8 mile Falmouth Town Limits at this time, or its status after 65 years may have left it unsought, in any case it wasn't, but the brand registration would be less geographically defined and of more immediate interest. He was obviously living somewhere nearby with animals throughout 1726 and 1727. Misc p37, p42, p76
On April 12, 1728 Joseph and Sarah Pride had a son Joseph born in Falmouth. The Joseph born in 1728, the executioner's grandson, would go on to become Captain Joseph Pride in George Washington's Continental Navy where he served with his oldest son Joseph Pride (Thomas, Joseph, Joseph, Joseph's, Joseph), and with his younger sons John, Peter and... Thomas War.
True to the legend, the Pride Family lineage, is one first born Joseph Pride after another, every generation across THREE centuries. There is a living first born Joseph in his honor in every US census up to 1900 (see Ancestry.com links below). It is the Pride family's silent testimony to its history, the only safe testimony possible for such a hunted figure at first, and as centuries passed,... for a forgotten one. The 1790 Census for Falmouth, Maine for example lists William, John, Henry, Joseph, and a second Joseph, a Joseph for each generation, (1822)
The 1820 census gives a tantalizing glimpse into the family secret listing both a Thomas, another Joseph, and William, and Henry. Multiple second born Thomas, William, John, Samuel and Henry Pride's occurring over the years are noted. They are the same Family Names throughout the years of first born Josephs. Lord Thomas Pride's sons were Thomas, William, John, Samuel and Joseph, daughter Elizabeth and uncle Henry. This puritan revolutionary family's determination to leave a mark over multiple generations of Joseph always first, not General, Grandee, and Knighted, Sir Thomas is a powerful statement of determination by multiple generations in multiple family branches.
First born Josephs in the Census
1637... 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900
Family Names in the Census
1637... 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900
The escape story makes sense in this light. The preference of the name Joseph over an official English Lord in the family,... lends credence to the rest, but there is more.
Great effort was taken to hide the identity of the executioner. Many guesses were later made, most naming prominent puritans like Hugh Peters. But all were accounted for. Soldiers lined the platform to obscure the view, the executioner was obviously somebody they wanted to protect. The executioner wore a wig and a grotesque fake beard. The executioner held the head aloft but flubbed his lines and did not say the traditional "behold the head of a traitor", and then unceremoniously dropped the king's head into the crowd (two strong indicators of inexperience). The fake beard, the total silence, and the flubbed performance may support the story further. From the evidence we have, Joseph was still a boy in 1649 and it may have been necessary to hide his lack of a beard to avoid recognition as well as his childs voice. His actual birth date is unknown, but the evidence we have indicates he was 12 or 13 years old in 1649, and not the super skilled executioner favorites such as Anne Boleyn got and bragged about. Was this just a measure of thier contempt for Charles 1st? The 200,000 deaths Charles 1st caused were Maces bashing heads in, swords slashing throats, blood and terror everywhere. That's why history hung the moniker "That Man of Blood" around what was left of his neck after Joseph got done with him.
But if he indeed was that young, how could such a decision be arrived at? Was there more than just their contempt for Charles ? The circumstances offer a possible explanation and a very strong validating hint. Oliver Cromwell, famous for his puns, crude practical jokes, and riddles,... left a last riddle for posterity and now we know what it was.
Firstly, you are dealing with the religious zealot Oliver Cromwell here. Second the impetus would had to have originated with the boy Joseph. The regular puritan executioner refused £200 pounds to do it,... no one wanted the job. They all knew the wrath of the royalists would follow the axe man all his days. Colonel John Hewson was given the task of finding an executioner and he offered 40 soldiers the position of executioner or assistant in exchange for £100 and quick promotion, though none came forward.
The puritans make no secret of the rejection by 40 soldiers for an executioner or assistant, they actually seem to promote it even. It would seem an odd point for them to put into history*, but then there is this...
Twice a day for 40 days, morning and evening, Goliath, the champion of the Philistines, comes out between the lines and challenges the Israelites to send out a champion of their own to decide the outcome in single combat, but Saul is afraid.
The first army of the living God had declined to fight 40 times in pairs (morning and evening), so it seems did Oliver Cromwell's self proclaimed second army of the living God (executioner or assistant). Both Goliath and Charles were alike accused of defying the armies of the living God. Only the boy David stepped forward to represent the first army of the living God, and only the boy Joseph for the second ? Did at this point the boy make an impassioned plea to be the David of the Age, to step forward where no other would?
The religious parallels at the most religious of moments for the puritans would have been an intoxicating brew for the devout. It is the only possible path by which to arrive at such a selection... and the pieces fit so well.
1 Samuel 17:25 The king will give great wealth to the man who kills him (Goliath). He will also give him his daughter in marriage and will exempt his family from taxes in Israel.”
in the riddle called...
(£100 and quick promotion)
King Charles 2nd reputedly told his life long mistress, Louise de Kérouaille, Duchess of Portsmouth, the executioner was "Pride" but it is
unclear what was said (see page image).
For over three hundred and fifty plus years now the literati have always assumed he meant Thomas Pride.
However, because Thomas was seen unmasked on the stage, the King's comment has been rejected and ignored with exaggerated distain.
But it is unknown if he actually said Thomas Pride or just Pride ? Charles 2nd's
soldiers detained,... jailed,... and... tortured or ...executed
almost the entire puritan leadership,
and made deals with the rest for clemancy.
Any candidate for executioner, it would seem, needs to address the reason for the Crowns silence on what it knew,
for they likely knew (and know) everything.
Ten years on with the flush of numerical revelations well in the past, the question has to be asked which of the parties left standing would have a motivation to reveal the truth in the year 1660 ? Does the David 2 story burnish the rejected puritan rule, or sound more like child murder ten years later? Does the Crown want it known it was a child that finished a King? Worse in a still largely puritan England does Charles 2nd want to promote a myth with Charles 1st in the role of Goliath and the new David still on the loose ? In 1660 all parties have strong motivations to not disclose the truth and the situation does not change thereafter. The reasons for the Crowns silence are now clear, the truth was both a challenge to the very concept of monarchy, a child killing a King, and a personal threat to Charles II himself, casting him in the role of usurper to the "new David". The puritain diaspora had even more powerful and dire motivations, they must protect the very life of the new David with their secrecy.
Early Maine records are of course, sparse. Early probates and others have been lost to fires. Just one of the many examples is Revolutionary War Soldier Thomas Pride (Lord Thomas Pride's second great grandson), whose only documentation is a Massachusetts Role listing his service in Falmouth in his father's regiment in 1780, but there are no local records of his existence.
The entire issue of the initial events once in America, is of course clouded and confused by the fugitive status under pain of death which discouraged accurate regicide identifying documentation in the strongest possible manner, even for descendants. During the American Revolution in 1776, Redcoats would regularly walk hundreds of miles just to spit on the gravestone of Regicide John Dixwell who died in 1689.
Alias John Pride married Jane Lovering of
Sheepscot Maine
during King Philips War in 1675, when Indians were killing colonists all over the east coast, especially in Maine.
Mutual hosility accelerated
throughout 1674 leading up to
the Falmouth massacres in 1675.
Alias John Pride took the oath for Freeman Status in July of 1674.
Massachusetts Freeman Records list the oath as taken at Pemaquid, Maine as does the
Beverly Marriage listing.
The Pemaquid Court summoned area residents to take the Oath. 'John' Pride's name
appears with the Jurymen appointed for the process (Humphries to Cole). He is listed as the Juryman for Damariscove, a 200 acre Island 6 miles offshore.
Down East would have been Joseph's only option to flee the growing indian troubles in Falmouth, when English settlers
gossip was even more dangerous to him than the Indians.
When your tiny farm hidden 8 miles deep in dense woods becomes too dangerous,... and civilization is even more dangerous,
a remote tiny island just down the coast would have been the only available safe direction. As the war got Worse
the Entire Maine Coastal population fled
for Beverly en-mass, where
in all the confusion, alias 'John' married fellow refugee Jane Lovering of Sheepscot Maine in 1675.
The Crown deposed Jane Lovering's niece and others about alias John Pride in 1737, 88 years after the execution, in multiple jurisdictions. Underwoods deposition only targeted John Pride. Alias John Pride never owned property. He would have been 100 years old in 1737. Multiple Majesties were involved in the investigation. He was the most wanted man in the world. Adding to the confusion, the Crown's hunt itself, was a government secret. The citations are comments that mysteriously appear in original Deeds from both Suffolk (18:253) and York County records (Vol XVIII), that were accidentally picked up in the massive document searches by the authoritative reference work "The Great Migration". There may be more of them outside its 1620-1640 primary search parameters (for root individuals) yet to be discovered.
Lord Pride's son John Pride (the Executioner's brother), died at birth in the 1630s. The original John Pride of Salem who died in 1647 was Lord Pride's nephew, the executioner's cousin. Joseph is the only offspring of Lord Thomas whose life is unaccounted for. The history in England of all the other offspring is known. They all died in England leaving no Pride lineage. Pride was a very rare and uncommon last name at this time and the world of 1674 has one too many Johns and is missing any reference to a Joseph anywhere, not to mention his verified millions.
Surviving King Williams war may have been more a matter of luck than good timing. King Williams war was a series of targeted military surprise attacks by Joint French and Indian forces against targets like Fort Loyal in Falmouth in 1690. The 200 indians attacking Ft Loyal were Norridgewok and Canadian from a long distance away, not local. A Sherman style scortched earth campaign against random settlers may have occurred as targets of opportunity but the local Indian Population was much reduced by this time. Pride Farm was only 8 miles from Fort Loyal, but it was 8 miles of uninterupted dense Forest that hid it, and that may have been enough, the Fort Loyal attack came by sea.
As the indian threat subsided, the Prides at some point returned to Maine for safety from the Crown. A crown with less to do was much more of a threat. Pride Farm by 1676 was the result of a large masting crews efforts, the help and materials he got/brought initally (he was rich) and 14 years of his labor. It would have been a perfect fugitive nest to settle into and raise a family. The area at that time, was depopulated of any British loyalists that would hang him, as well as any local indians who would kill him. His enemies had all gone to war and he was the only victor. He survived the crowns never ending world wide search because of the Indian wars. No records were kept locally for 50 more years, until the 1720's. But the children left deeds, grants, a brand registration, birth notices and news articles. The same family names, including Jane begin to appear only in Maine records, and they appear in volume right at the start with the first census and regular records (see ancestry links below).
Somewhat conclusively,...given Ancestry.com's level of comprehensiveness...Joseph is not listed on any passenger list (because he swam for it !). There is only one immigration record for last name Pride between 1600 and 1700 to New England. John Pride, 1637, Salem, Massachusetts who died in 1647 leaving the absolutely letter perfect Cover Name to have if the absolute top priority of the King of England and the entire British Empire for 50 years is to mount your head on a spike.
Massachusetts falsely recorded the "birth" of a Joseph Pride on 12 Dec 1686 in Beverly Essex. This is the anchor record for later inventions by the dishonest and inept but widely quoted William Willis to the parent Joseph of George Washington's Naval Captain Joseph Pride, as "arriving" from Beverly in 1726 at the age of 40. Willis had no way of determining when the Joseph "born" in Beverly in 1686 "arrived", that was just the date of the first record for the name, an Animal Brand Registration. The Brand Registration was on Jan 20, 1726 so according to Willis he must have "arrived" in the dead of Winter with animals ! Animals that he just couldn't wait to register :)
Massachusetts falsely recorded a total of Six Prides as being born on that very same day in tiny Beverly Essex. However the Massachusetts source for these official Massachusetts birth records are the church baptisms of the First Church. This source lists 50 pages of baptisms for Beverly Essex before 1710. Most are single baptisms, with the occasional double, but the family of a John and Jane Pride are all registered the same day proving this family of six Pride children were coming from a great distance for baptisms that were greatly delayed in 1686. If not Prides Corner then from where? There simply are no other candidates, no other concentrations of the Pride name pre 1776 save Beverly itself. Why such an extreme delay in a puritan family risking eternal damnation for the children? Dying without Baptism was a very serious matter in the puritan world. Did the death of his persuer Charles 2nd the year before finally reduce the intensity of the search enough to finally allow the baptisms?
Joseph the executioner was born in 1637 in London and his brother John died at Birth. The names baptized Dec 12, 1686 for the mysterious "John" and Jane are names from Lord Pride's family. For a deeply Religious fugitive in hiding, baptisms are where the rubber meets the road. They MUST BE BAPTIZED, his real name could bring down the crown on all of them (the hunt was still on), no name implies bastard and that would not do either. Joseph was caught between the proverbial rock (Death) and a hard place (Damnation).
Fortunately for history, Puritan New England seems to have gotten married and baptized in the First Church of Beverly Massachusetts until 1710. The names of all six baptized Children show up repeatedly in the Pre-Civil War Falmouth Maine census records ( John William Peter Joseph Mary Elizabeth ) while only Peter shows up in the Beverly Essex pre-civil War census records. ( John William Peter Joseph Mary Elizabeth ) In powerful support for the winter baptisim pilgrimage with six small children all under 12 years old, the name Jane Pride, for the formerly Jane Lovering, also shows up repeatedly in Falmouth, Maine. My favorite is Mary Jane Pride combining the Executioner's daughter and wifes names in a "smokey concoction" in 1828.
In 1710 the last of the First Generation moves south, out of the wilderness, possibly indicating the death of the executioner that year (age 73). William baptizes his first four children born in 1699-1701-03-07 in Beverly on Dec 18, 1709, then the last three are baptized normally, each one soon after birth in 1711-13-16. He dies in 1751 in Norwich Conneticut near his wifes family. Peter baptises both Jonathan (1702) and Hannah (1704) in Beverly Aug 13, 1710 and becomes a resident of the town dying there in 1743. The executioners son Joseph is the first son to leave the nest for Beverly, marrying Elizabeth Bond in 1702 his children are baptized as born in 1703-06-07. Joseph, perhaps the odd man out, relocates to Gloucester in 1710, and then returns to Falmouth after his wife Elizabeth Bond dies in 1716. All Maine Prides are thought to descend from him and his second wife Sarah from Gloucester 1721. Jane, the family matriarch, appears to leave the wilderness around the same time, dying in Beverly in 1713 as "Goodwife" Pride. There is no record of Alias John Prides death.
Mary, designated the second oldest in the Baptisim records, leaves the wilderness first marrying John Lovett in Beverly March 5, 1695 . The executioners youngest daughter, Elizabeth, goes next declaring an "Intention to Marry" in Beverly, the first Pride to do so (already living there?) on May 21, 1698 and then weds Beverly resident Lot Conant three weeks later on, June 14, 1698. Women were both more at risk and of less use in the totally depopulated wilderness that followed King Williams war. John dissappears from records after 1686 either dying early or staying in Falmouth where no records were kept. The others seem to have fled the uninhabited wilderness for the bright lights of Beverly at the earliest opportunity, who could blame them.
Genealogists all over the place are mistaking ceremonies performed at the First Church as residency which it is clearly not. Available data indicates that the number baptized before 1710 was triple or greater than the entire population of Beverly in 1710. With Marriges, Funerals and Holidays thrown in,... The First Church must have been a very busy place ! See: First Church records Analyzer Research Ongoing and the awesome earth shaking Ancestry.com is still updating and expanding.
Falmouth "Historical" Society "research" found that the fugitive family left no land registrations before an 1870 purchase fom the Puringtons, given the history its no surprise. When your first who will challenge your claim ! Its just one more demonstration of the long running fugitive status and mindset. But go a short distance in any direction from Pride Farm Road and you will find Pride burials, and 39 nearby burials are pre-1870 !! The Names of Lord (Thomas), the Executioner (Joseph), and the Executioner's wife (Jane) are all there as well as all the other family names of Lord Pride.
Today's Pride farm was purchased from the Purington family, its original builders in 1870,
209 years after the executioner arrived,... by the executioners
great great grandson, Alexander (Executioner 1637, Joseph 1686, Capt Joseph 1728, Henry 1757, Alexander 1802).
Henry's tombstone (
Alexander's father who died 1836) is in the Gowen Cemetary next-door, as are the tombstones of his
brother Henry (1852) and sister Nancy
(1848).
The Purington purchase looks like a mechanism to establish the legality of Pride lands in the years after the revolution.
Both census and burial records indicate a substantial number of Prides occupying
the Pride Farm in the early 1800s.
The 1790 census lists the one Lord, two Puringtons,
one Huston and Seven Prides all within a few lines of each other.
In the 1810 census there are 9 Prides listed in Falmouth,
but by 1820 all but two moved to nearby towns primarily Cumberland and Westbrook,
leaving William and Francis who continue on.
The 1850 census lists Six Prides in dwelling "338" and Nine Puringtons in dwelling "339".
The Pride home (dwelling 338) may have burned sometime in the 1850's.
The 1860 Census only lists
Joseph Pride living in the Lord House on Mast Road with the elderly Abigail and her daughter Eunice, and he is
buried with them in the Lord-Lowell Cemetary (boat launch).
(He self identified in the Census as "Servant", who says puritains didn't have a sense of humor).
The 1880 Census lists the Prides rehoused in dwelling 330, between the Puringtons in dwelling 329,
and Hustons in dwelling 331, with the Puringtons still in residence more than a decade after the "sale".
The plot next door to the Purington House has always been regarded by the family as the original cabins location, and the foundation stones of "dwelling "330" were found and destroyed there just a few years ago. The area was finally plowed, but was carefully examined beforehand finding residential foundation stones in the expected location. My mother pointed it out to me when I was 12, I looked at the Purington house an she said "NO over here, I want you to remember this" re-pointing to the spot where the foundation stones were found, an empty corner of the turning square. In response to my repeated complaints that there was nothing there, she finally said there were visible ruins during her lifetime that had dissappeared. To which I gave a dismissive response :). But I remembered... Mom was a pretty smart cookie.
When Joseph Arrived in 1661 in this area, it was Mast road or nothing and the turning square would have been the only open area, an area surrounded by mountains of old dead wood and miles of dense forest. The area remained wilderness until 1761. It was indian territory with no obvious advantages for settlement for anyone but a fugitive before 1761. Even those advantages would have quickly dissappeared if the land had not been worked and had reverted to wilderness. Turning squares that were occupied and worked became the town squares, but most of them rapidly vanished into the wilderness. The Puringtons built where they built for a reason, they had a neighbor, and the road to the river had 100 years of use by 1761. Without that use by the Pride family there would have been no road, it would have dissappeared into the wilderness like most of them did. Unworked land and roads dissappear in about 25 years. The Pride Farm of 1761 was a square cut out of dense forest, 8 Miles from anything, accessible only via a 3 mile logging path leading to the last navigable upper portion of a small river with no traffic, the Presumpscot. The Puringtons choice of location in 1761, can not be explained without the Prides prior occupation.
Joseph's cabin was depicted on an early 1700's painted plate that always hung prominently over our Kitchen table until 1968. The painted plate was handed down through the generations, along with the story, and is missing today. From the angle it may have been painted from the Purington House roof. The fired clay plate was fractured into one inch square pieces in 1968 by me in a violent fight with my brother (the first one I won :), then meticulously reconstructed with a dark clay bonder. Its colors are predominantly yellow and blue/green.
Prides Corner is a Place
Joseph Pride was Thomas Pride's son, brother in-law of Oliver Cromwell's nephew, and brother-in-law of Naval Admiral Thomas Monk's daughter, definitely Puritan Royalty :) The man who landed here was at the very center the puritan movement, and it turns out, its history. In his will, General, now Lord Thomas Pride ignores normal protocol and does not leave everything to the first born son. He largely skips his two oldest sons leaving just five pounds each and in its tenth paragraph leaves 4000 pound sterling coins, almost the entire estate, to his fifth born son Joseph who was still a minor when it was written. The reason for the largess to a teenager is not specified, but its all in cash. Joseph inherited the estate of an English Lord as a young man less than two years before he had to run for it, then he vanishes from British Records without a trace. There are No marriage, birth or death records and no Land Deeds. (Credit:Troy Bennett Bangor Daily News). The only known written records (using his given name) of his life so far are the multiple references in Lord Pride's will, which is an official document of Parliment.
However, there are Numerous reports from local senior citizens of hunters finding a Fifty pound lump of half melted civil war era silver coins in Suckfish Brook in the 60's (near to Pride Farm Road). It was the talk of the town for years. I remember family conversations about this as a teenager in the 1960's. I can remember puzzled conversations about where it had come from and speculation if it was pirate loot, and why were they melting it.
(Watch 7 Witnesses Memories)
I first found out about the inheritance and the will from Bangor Daily News reporter Troy Benett in Oct 2023, then put it together when another customer related their version of this very story purely 'out of the blue' standing in line at JARS a day or two later. Oddly, the very first seven gray hairs I queried in Windham in the winter of 24 all remembered it and are recorded in the above video,.. the next 150 knew nothing !
As a 14 year old, I remember my father in family conversations with my sister describing the find as a half melted 50 pound
lump of old coins from "before anyone was supposed to be there",
and that they "were all dated a hundred years before there was anyone there". No knowledge of the will was known til a couple of years ago,
so my father never put it together with the silver found a mile away, there was no obvious connection. My father's 20 year business partner,
famous Harness Horse Driver Donnie Richards , confirmed my father
personally knew the hunters, and told him about it.
Byron G Pride was a widely known, rigorously honest, highly respected, large scale lakefront Real Estate developer, 500 people stood throughout his
funeral because the seats were full. They
lined the sidewalk 3 deep in front of the church throughout the service. You can hear the pride in the association and admiration in Donnie Richards voice.
The descriptions I overheard at age 16, were his own first hand observations and are thus, highly reliable descriptions.
One hunter Robert Munroe, deceased in 1978, has been identified, by his widow, who saw the coins, expanded interview video upcoming.
The find fits the unsuccessful attempt to melt the distinctive coins to a form he could use without alerting the crown to his
presence. He failed and just buried
the mess, then the Suckfish changed stream and dug it out. In the 1960s two Hunters looked down and there was this huge ball of silver just
sitting there in the middle of the stream !
Melting on a river bank would have enabled Joseph to extinquish the smoke if a lookout fired a warning shot or it could have
been to avoid the dried fuel left by the Masting. It was clearly an act of desperation during the early years.
Please contact the author if you have any information about this.
The 3700 remaining pounds sterling of the period specified in the will, would directly translate to 234 million dollars,
calculated using
a 2015 Auction as a rare coin, all the same or
different types is unknown. But its a lot of money in any case.
Joseph would have been unable to spend the coins locally, for himself or the cause, until well after the death of Charles 2nd in 1685. Circulating distinctive and uncommon Civil War minted silver would have lead the Redcoats to his door in short order in the small and confined colonial economy. In the early years, at least locally, the coins were a mortal threat to him, not a source of wealth.
However limited evidence
is emerging of later expenditures beginning decades after the death of Charles 2nd. Joseph, the odd man out, purchases land
in 1693 at age 13 with 13 pounds of silver, adjacent to John Prides (died 1647),
William buys another small also adjacent piece for 3 pounds in 1701.
Joseph buys 3 lots when Portland is laid out in 1728.
"Six Pounds in silver money" shows up in Peters will in 1731.
William, the oldest, leaves 34 oz of Silver each to Sarah and Lucy, and a large black lock box with Key 90 years later in 1751.
The cost of the escape ship and supporting the supply line in the early years must also be taken into account.
Related families such as the Loverings and the Prides of Beverly may also have benefited.
The funding of the first Bridge across the Presumpscot (conveniently at the end of the logging path), in the early 1700s called
"Pride's Bridge" (Route 302) is undetermined.
No other obvious funding sources jump out for the early 1700s, but the town repaired it in 1794.
Its creation likely lead to local development such as the Puringtons in 1761, (whom it predates)
by providing a land route to falmouth neck (Portland).
The coins may somehow be related to the confusing 1870 sham sale by the Puringtons.
But the total identifiable amounts seem short for such a vast fortune so far, but it seems clear he did tell his kids at some point, and they likely spent it.
Unfortunately all Falmouth probates of this period were lost in a town hall fire. Investigation ongoing.
William and Hannah declare an intention to Marry on July 22, 1699, She Gives birth to John two months later Sept 3, 1699 (Nine months after Christmas-see Residence Date listed as 1709), then Dec 26, 1700 the day after the next christmas, they are both convicted of fornication before marriage. William appears alone ("alledging his wife is sick") avoiding any mention of information that could expose his father, he states they are now married but no marriage is recorded (falmouth?). John is finally baptised along with the William, Herbert and Sarah in 1709. Tradewind sailing schedules generally arrived between mid winter and spring, making christmas a part of the 'safe' period (June-Febuary) when they would have known who was in town. Sailing Falmouth to Beverly would have been a one day trip each way. Costal fishing likely provided a communications link of sorts with the Prides of Beverly in the earliest years.
Of the twelve regicides who fled England in the spring of 1660, the fate of three in the US is officially known. Geoffe, Whaley and Dixwell were actively hunted in various episodes until 1689 throughout Massachusetts and New Haven (some 40 years later). One attempt included a contingent of 450 British Redcoats. They escaped with the assistance of widespread puritan support. In a very real sense the American Revolution was simply a continuation of the British Civil War on new ground. They eventually found safety in the wilderness in western Massachusetts just beyond the western edge of civilization, far away from towns and possible gossip, and survived.
Given the decades long world wide campaign to execute the Regicides and the level of settlement in the area around presumpscot river falls in the 1660's, its location, just beyond the northern edge of civilization, far away from towns and possible gossip, actually makes sense if you don't want to get hung drawn and quartered. It was the same solution as the others, just a different direction, 100 miles north of Boston instead of 100 miles west.
It is fascinating to note the pervasive influence in the Prides Corner, Falmouth area of the British Civil War and the Puritans. Falmouth Maine was named for the Battle of Falmouth in 1646 and the rolls of the New Model Army that fought there read like the town registers. Levolor names predominate, I am proud to say. A Rainsborough cut my hair as a child, another was my teacher, as was Mr Graves, a Winslow trained my father's race horses, and a Richards drove them, our neighbors... Frye, Moody, Potter, Butler and Bailey. The list of New Model Army names that matched my childhood was stunning. I can imagine how strong the mythology must have been through the revolutionary war years and much later. The ongoing puritan character of the area would go far to explaining the second century of Josephs and the uniquely puritan twist of private pride and public shunning on a topic like Regicide and Execution in the family tree (especially without proof). Even as late as the 1950's Oliver Cromwell was oft quoted in my family circles. "Warts and All" was a common favorite.
At the heart of every puritan family is the family bible, listing ancestors back as far as possible on the inside cover and front pages. Puritan Bibles were made with a half a dozen blank front cover pages special for the purpose. I saw a Pride family bible once (whereabouts unknown) that went back to 1820s. Every line a different handwriting (Quill to Iron to Ballpoint as I recall). Puritan Bibles were where you went to consider names for your expected. It was often a family affair with the expectant mother asking questions about the name choices listed and learning her husbands family history. Both Thomas and Samuel reappear in the Falmouth census of 1800, Elizabeth pops up in 1850. That's everybody,... just in case there was any doubt who this family really is :)
Ironically, It was My Grandmother's (Inez Pride) irritation with author John Lewis (yesterdays family villan turned into todays family hero) and his book "The Early History of Prides Corner" ignoring her claims that caused her to shake her finger at my father and insist he tell me the story in the fall of 1968. Byron Pride (my father) was a skeptic, likely influenced by new knowlege of the "official massachusets birth record" that seemed to refute everything for decades til it finally revealed all with the baptism records. He said everybody's been claiming this since day one, I am supposed to tell you so... and afterward shrugged and says who really knows, but with a smile added "heck of a good story tho." I heartily agreed, I was as you can imagine floored. He also dutifully told me to tell my kids and to tell them to tell theirs. Despite his doubts, when he added that there was a deep seriousness in his demeanor unlike anything else I ever witnessed from this honorable citizen, community leader and all round wonderful human being. My dad. It made the impression he intended. In response to my specific query he traced his sources back as far as his grandfather Byron Pride born in 1847 (pictured above - note the distinctly puritan appearance), his father Merritt born in 1888, and several others whose names I did not recognize, long dead by the fall of 1968. My Grandfather Merritt, who was still living the year I was passed the baton, was alive during the life of the last First Born Joseph in our branch.
The three great turning points in Mankinds long progress toward democracy are the Magna Carta, the Execution of Charles 1st, and the Declaration of Independence. Their relative importance can be debated in each case. In only one was it accomplished by just one single individual representing the will of the nation. It is the purpose of the site to reveal history but also to mark it. A reconstruction of Josephs cabin recorded on an early 1700's hand painted plate and a state of Maine holiday on Dec 12, to mark these events here in our midst seems appropriate. A Holiday to celebrate one brave resourceful mans final victory over monstrous Tyranny in the form of six baptisims. Highland lake should really be renamed "Josephs Lake" to note the huge role it played in world history. It was his refuge, his water, and his food source, it protected him from the Kings Vengence
*Contemporary accounts reveal any levolor would have seemingly gladly hefted the axe,... so the statement is a sore thumb for all to see on its face. I am of the opinion, awaiting evidence, a universal decline (except for Joseph) probably did happen, almost would have had too, bumping it into the supernatural realm for its participants anyway, leading to the 40 and phrasing of its result. But the religious, spiritual and moral aspects of the decision which is being noted here are difficult to discern. Did Cromwell, upon finding no volunteers, initiate a survey of 40 ? (shame shame Oliver,... tho shalt not test...). Worse possibility, did he ask none or reject all, and sponsor adolescent murder to use in the manufacture of allegory to support his contention that he lead the second army of the living God ? Of course, it also could have been 40 arrived at without guile, which almost certainly would have lead to the same result by the power of its allegory alone. Its not a number a puritan would have missed under the circumstances.
Recently this article is getting support from several authoritative sources. The following is a recent post from the Author of "In the Name of the Crown" which was a published work about the flight of the regicides.
|
|
The title of Cromwells Buffon is a play on the characterizations of the bitter Royalists in the centuries that followed. It is typical ruling class derision without foundation on display. Sir Thomas Pride, as the text makes clear, was the opposite of the royalist characterization in every respect. He was a successful and incredibly capable individual, one who was obstinately independent to the point of opposing Cromwell as a virtual equal on important occasions. He is credited as blocking Oliver Cromwell from accepting the title of King in 1657. In what became a common english jest of the period for blunt speaking, he gave Cromwell "Colonel Pride's Common Council". He looked him in the eye and said so many had died to end Kingships that he would "shoot him in the head at the first opportunity if he acccepted". It was not in jest, Lord Pride was a Jarhead's Jarhead, a frontline officer who lead elite troops in savage hand to hand combat. Cromwell, who was about to accept it, declined the offer soon after. He was active in civic life, a leading london businessman in the decade before the war, a central figure in the New Model Army, the central figure in building the British Fleet, and a forceful medical reformer in the post war years pioneering PTSD treatment for his soldiers as inspector of both of Londons military hospitals and governor of St Bartholomews hospital in London. He became a leader of charitable agencies for aging soldiers and the poor in his senior years.
He was a front line officer under Essex in many battles, including the bloody 1st and 2nd battles of Newbury (50% combined casualties), and was in command of a regiment during the decisive battle of Naseby under Fairfax on 14 June 1645. He accompanied Cromwell north to final victory as the commander of a brigade of three regiments at the battle of Preston in August 1648 (commanding the entire right wing). In 1653, when Admiral Blake nearly died of the fever, Lord Pride, a leader of divisions of foot, was to become Commander of the British Navy, but the Admiral survived. Lord Pride helped build and run a good part of British Fleet,... and he almost got to command the British Fleet in battle in person. After the war, To the sound of screeching Royalist derision, he closed the Bear Pit at Southwark, where savage packs of dogs killed tied up bears, tearing them to pieces solely for the entertainment of fancily dressed Cavaliers. His reasons were a sophisticated and poignant lesson in Morality that escaped the Royalists entirely and that most of the world today would not readily grasp.
The near erasure of this giant of the times, Lord Thomas Pride, from history is a powerful lesson for today, as we watch a very similar process working on the memory of JFK
Thomas Pride changed the world forever for the better with his actions.
This Giant of History single handedly, apparently by his own decision, changed the entire sweep of British History and the history of the
Western World with Prides Purge and abolished absolute monarchy for us all.
Right Man, Right Place, Right Time.
by Dan Pride
6th Great Grandson of Joseph Pride
Lord Thomas Pride Unknown
Joseph Pride 1637 (Executioner)
Joseph Pride 1686
Capt Joseph Pride 1728
John Pride 1762
David Pride 1812
Byron Pride 1847
Merritt Pride 1888
Byron Pride 1921
Daniel Pride 1952
Compare the Animal Brand Described in Josephs 1726 Brand Registration to see if its the same as Lord Pride used in England.
Identify the instigator of the multiple depositions in 1737, and connections of any individuals named in the documents. More details would be useful here.
Investigate reported irregularities in 1674 Freemen assignments, origination points and origination jurymen or majistrates characteristics. I noticed other Jurymen seemed to appear twice except John Pride in the list but my list is incomplete. First move flee to family, oops get transported to the nether isles with the paperwork for the everpresent and dominant navy there, yikes run from the indians ?
Look for connections to the Puringtons. Why did they build there in 1761, the location by itself doesnt make sense even with the road. Check wills etc.
Is there a connection between the stunning prevelance of New Model Army surnames in the falmouth area and Lord Pride's Masting Crews in the 1650's. A statistical comparison of new model army names with the names in falmouth town records book one, might do to the trick. The Names appear to be predominately levelor. While Lord Pride was definately not a levelor, politically he was a fellow travelor and they dominated the ranks under him.
Parlimentary records reportedly contained many of the original Masting Work orders when Cambridge Universities classic "Forests and Seapower" was written in 1926, do they still exist for Duck Pond? or did the Luftwaffe get them.
Identifying the Ship and Harbor should be easy now we know an approximate date and reviewing all voyage documents for previously missed or misunderstood information. The ship could have been a Naval Vessel, not yet on board with the transition.
Reviewing British Civil War documents for same
Review Beverly "Last will and testaments as well as Deeds from Beverly to 1750 as soon as the typeset versions become available. Parchements have proved too difficult.
Find a New England Weather Report from Dec 12, 1686
Trace the wearabouts of Naval Vessels during the transition to Charles 2nd.
Survey Coin dealers for any historic unusual activity in 17th century British Pounds
Researching this amazing woman Jane Lovering who followed the puritan hero into the Wilderness in the years following widespread massacres by the Maine Indians?
Detailed examination of the baptisim geographic patterns of the First Church, how common were long baptisim pilgrimages?
Reviewing documents and the culture and beliefs of the First Church.
Reviewing new model army records related to the Units commanded by Thomas Pride during the second civil war.
I will be traveling to London for research and meetings in the New Year and would be delighted to conspire with any interested parties DanPride@Gmail.com
James and Rose Pride arrive in Falmouth from Liverpool England aboard the Nestorian in 1867 implying 200 year transatlantic family connections existed.
Statistically analyse the incidence of births named Joseph both before and after the execution to discover if in fact knowledge was (as is suspected) widespread in the puritan community and has been suppressed somehow by the crown. and if true to determine how such a thing could be accomplished. The history of Rewriting of history may be a fascinating history lesson for the world. To understand Josephs status in puritan circles, imagine there was a successful assasin of Hitler and we are talking about him in jewish circles. Charles killed a larger percentage of Britains with his absurd wars than Hitler did. Despite the absurd Royalist depictions, Charles 1st was a small weak man, who didn't speak til he was three, then stuttered all his life but insisted he was all powerful over everyone. He was a cuckold (Charles 2nd was the result of his wifes affair with Henry Jermyn) with a wife who openly expressed distain for his manhood during crisis. He was rumored to have been intimate with his father's favorite object, Lord Buckingham (as in Bucking the Ham). He was a totally arrogant fool whose foolishness killed multitudes without one iota of remorse. No one was ever more justly beheaded.
Any contributors will be fully credited in all works, contact author link above
It cracks me up to see the image of Charles 2nd in full regailia with septer and all. Can you imagine having this guy dedicated to putting your head on a spike throughout his entire life,... for something you did when you were 12, and you defeat him and survive to raise a large family, with every single one baptized ! :)
All Pride Documents before 1800
See Pride Family Genetic History on 23andme.com and Ancestry.com
I want to Thank All the smart old guys down at the Westbrook Historical Society for their help going back to my first Census Records Search in the 1990's.
